[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110305201750.GB20321@serpens.de>
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2011 21:17:51 +0100
From: "S.P.Zeidler" <spz@...BSD.org>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Vendor-sec hosting and future of closed lists
Hi,
Thus wrote Solar Designer (solar@...nwall.com):
> > - If yes, would it be an idea to confine or split into lists of focus groups?
> > (like Linux vendors, BSD vendors, all OSS source using vendors, etc?)
>
> My current proposal is: split into several sub-lists. I'd start with
> three: Linux vendors, *BSD vendors, security "researchers". The vendor
> groups would be for externally submitted reports (by non-members) and
> for cross-vendor discussions.
I'd suggest four, then: Linux (kernel and libc), BSD (kernel and other
items shared between BSDs, but not commonly seen in Linux distributions),
shared/userland (who eg doesn't have OpenSSL?), and researchers
(no opinion on the latter).
best regards,
spz
--
spz@...pens.de (S.P.Zeidler) spz@...BSD.org
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
