[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CB3A0E3.1090809@wireshark.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 16:42:27 -0700
From: Gerald Combs <gerald@...eshark.org>
To: Vincent Danen <vdanen@...hat.com>
CC: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: CVE requests: Poppler, Quassel, Pyfribidi, Overkill,
DocUtils, FireGPG, Wireshark
Vincent Danen wrote:
> * [2010-10-01 13:33:47 -0700] Gerald Combs wrote:
>
>> Vincent Danen wrote:
>>> * [2010-09-29 15:06:31 -0400] Josh Bressers wrote:
>>>
>>>>> 7. Wireshark BER dissector
>>>>> http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2010-09/0088.html
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This one looks like a stack overflow, the advisory isn't very clear,
>>>> but
>>>> claims there are two possible outcomes. We can always split later if
>>>> needed.
>>>> CVE-2010-3445
>>>
>>> Gerald, are you aware of this issue? Do you have further details
>>> regarding it? I poked around in bugzilla a bit but couldn't find
>>> anything.
>>>
>>> It claims 1.4.0, but is not clear as to whether or not older versions
>>> are affected.
>>
>> It's been fixed in the trunk (r34111) and is scheduled for inclusion in
>> 1.4.1 and 1.2.12. We're tracking it in bug 5230:
>>
>> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5230
>>
>> The bug affects all BER dissectors and not just SNMP.
>
> Great. Thank you for the information, Gerald. That is very helpful.
FYI, 1.4.1 and 1.2.12 have been released.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
