[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100916155413.3BC0.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 15:57:16 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, oss-security@...ts.openwall.com,
Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>,
Kees Cook <kees.cook@...onical.com>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, pageexec@...email.hu,
Brad Spengler <spender@...ecurity.net>, Eugene Teo <eugene@...hat.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] oom: remove totalpage normalization from oom_badness()
> On Thu, 16 Sep 2010, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>
> > Current oom_score_adj is completely broken because It is strongly bound
> > google usecase and ignore other all.
> >
>
> We've talked about this issue three times already. The last two times
> you've sent a revert patch, you failed to followup on the threads:
>
> http://marc.info/?t=128272938200002
> http://marc.info/?t=128324705200002
>
> And now you've gone above Andrew, who is the maintainer of this code, and
> straight to Linus. Between that and your failure to respond to my answers
> to your questions, I'm really stunned at how unprofessional you've handled
> this.
Selfish must die. you failed to persuade to me. and I havgen't get anyone's objection.
Then, I don't care your ugly whining.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
