[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1979823831.1610061283885156490.JavaMail.root@zmail01.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 14:45:56 -0400 (EDT)
From: Josh Bressers <bressers@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@...riknordstrom.net>,
"Steven M. Christey" <coley@...us.mitre.org>
Subject: Re: CVE Request -- Squid -- Denial of service due
internal error in string handling (SQUID-2010:3)
Please use CVE-2010-3072
Thanks.
--
JB
----- "Jan Lieskovsky" <jlieskov@...hat.com> wrote:
> Hello Steve, vendors,
>
> Squid upstream has announced SQUID-2010:3:
> [1] http://www.squid-cache.org/Advisories/SQUID-2010_3.txt
>
> addressing one denial of service issue:
> A denial of service flaw was found in the way Squid proxy caching
> server internally processed NULL buffers. A remote, trusted client
> could use this flaw to cause squid daemon crash (dereference NULL
> pointer)
> when processing specially-crafted request.
>
> ( Flaw description based on details from [1]. Henrik, please
> correct / complete
> me if something isn't appropriate and needs change. Thanks, Jan
> )
>
> Upstream patch (against Squid v3.0):
> [2]
> http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v3/3.0/changesets/squid-3.0-9189.patch
>
> Upstream patch (against Squid v3.1):
> [3]
> http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v3/3.1/changesets/squid-3.1-10090.patch
>
> Credit:
> The vulnerability was discovered by Phil Oester.
>
> References:
> [4] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630444
>
> Steve, could you please allocate CVE id for this issue?
>
> Thanks && Regards, Jan.
> --
> Jan iankko Lieskovsky / Red Hat Security Response Team
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
