Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2010 16:03:52 +0200
From: Nico Golde <>
Subject: Re: CVE request: lxr

* Josh Bressers <> [2010-05-14 21:48]:
> ----- "Dan Rosenberg" <> wrote:
> > Josh,
> > 
> > The XSS in the title string was already assigned CVE-2010-1448.  Do
> > you mean to assign issue #2, the XSS reflected in search results?
> > 
> Sigh, yes.
> So to sum it up:
> 1.  XSS in the ident parameter, as described in CVE-2009-4497.
> 2.  XSS that is reflected via the search results page after issuing
> This one is now CVE-2010-1625
> 3. 3.  XSS that is reflected via the <title> tag on the search page, as
> described in Raphael's original e-mail a few days ago, which Josh assigned
> CVE-2010-1448

CVE-2010-1738 seems to be a dupe of this?

Nico Golde - - - GPG: 0xA0A0AAAA
For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.