[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100608205135.GH4828@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 14:51:35 -0600
From: Vincent Danen <vdanen@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: "Steven M. Christey" <coley@...us.mitre.org>
Subject: Re: jar, fastjar directory traversal vulnerabilities
* [2010-06-08 16:01:30 -0400] Steven M. Christey wrote:
>On Tue, 8 Jun 2010, Vincent Danen wrote:
>
>>What makes things worse is that it doesn't look like CVE-2005-1080 was
>>ever fixed. So I'm not sure if this "new" jar issue needs a new CVE
>>name, or if it would be covered under CVE-2005-1080 (since nothing ever
>>claimed to fix this directory traversal vulnerability in jar).
>
>If a bug appears in versions X and Y, and there is no evidence that a
>fix was ever applied between versions X and Y, then the original
>CVE's description is simply updated.
Awesome, thanks for the clarification.
--
Vincent Danen / Red Hat Security Response Team
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
