Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87k4qlmajr.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 21:52:56 +0200
From: Florian Weimer <fw@...eb.enyo.de>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: CVE request: ghostscript and gv

* Bernhard R. Link:

> * Ludwig Nussel <ludwig.nussel@...e.de> [100528 12:05]:
>> Upstream suggested to use -P- in addition to -dSAFER.
>
> Either I mix something up or that option does not even help:
>
> With the Debian lenny version I get:
>
> $ touch gs_init.ps
> $ /usr/bin/gs -P- notneeded.ps
> GPL Ghostscript 8.62: Initialization file gs_init.ps does not begin with an integer.

"gs -P- -DSAFER gs_init.ps" works, too, so you can inject the payload
with file-name-preserving user agents.  8-(

Is the general consensus that we should patch this in
viewers/Ghostscript wrappers, and not Ghostscript itself?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.