oss-security - Re: CVE request - Linux Kernel KGDB/ppc issue

Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4BD8F280.5050601@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:44:16 +0800
From: Eugene Teo <eugene@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
CC: Hui Zhu <hui.zhu@...driver.com>,
        Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
        +security-linux <security-linux@...driver.com>,
        "Wessel, Jason" <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
        Wu Fei <fei.wu@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: CVE request - Linux Kernel KGDB/ppc issue

On 04/29/2010 10:13 AM, Hui Zhu wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The problem is that if KGDB is enabled on a powerpc board, a
> test that checks if a page is user or kernel is bypassed.
> This means that a user can write to arbitrary kernel address space.
>
> Upon further investigation, we found that kernels older than
> the v2.6.30-rc1 release have the same problem for non-booke
> ppc chips (74xx, 8641D), so we need two patches for kernels
> up to that date, and then one patch for ones after that date.

Hi Hui,

Just FYI, oss-security is a public mailing list. I noticed you have 
already cc'ed the KGDB maintainer. If you are trying to report a kernel 
security issue that is neither fixed not disclosed previously AFAIK, you 
might want to try CC'ing security@...nel.org and LKML. Drop LKML if you 
want to keep it private for a short period of time.

Thanks, Eugene

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.