Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BD8E8F0.1090502@windriver.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:03:28 +0800
From: Hui Zhu <hui.zhu@...driver.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
CC: coley@...us.mitre.org, ZhangXiao <xiao.zhang@...driver.com>,
        eugeneteo@...nel.sg
Subject: Re: CVE-2010-1173 kernel: skb_over_panic resulting
 from multiple invalid parameter errors

Eugene Teo:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/CVE-2010-1173
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/159531
> 
> Reported by Chris Guo from Nokia China via Red Hat Support. A similar
> issue was reported by Jukka Taimisto and Olli Jarva from Codenomicon Ltd
> via CERT-FI. This was also reported by Windriver on behalf of their
> customer via vendor-sec.
> 
> Kernel crash occurs if sctp listening port receives malformatted init
> package.
> 
> Its an skb_over_panic BUG halt that results from processing an init
> chunk in which too many of its variable length parameters are in some
> way malformed.
> 
> The problem is in sctp_process_unk_param:
> if (NULL == *errp)
>  *errp = sctp_make_op_error_space(asoc, chunk,
>       ntohs(chunk->chunk_hdr->length));
> 
>  if (*errp) {
>   sctp_init_cause(*errp, SCTP_ERROR_UNKNOWN_PARAM,
>      WORD_ROUND(ntohs(param.p->length)));
>   sctp_addto_chunk(*errp,
>    WORD_ROUND(ntohs(param.p->length)),
>       param.v);
> 
> When we allocate an error chunk, we assume that the worst case scenario
> requires that we have chunk_hdr->length data allocated, which would be
> correct nominally, given that we call sctp_addto_chunk for the violating
> parameter. Unfortunately, we also, in sctp_init_cause insert a
> sctp_errhdr_t structure into the error chunk, so the worst case
> situation in which all parameters are in violation requires
> chunk_hdr->length+(sizeof(sctp_errhdr_t)*param_count) bytes of data.
> 
> This fix solves the problem by allowing our implementation to only
> report a fixed number of errors.  When we encounter an error in
> parameter processing we allocate a chunk that is min(asoc->pathmtu,
> SCTP_DEFAULT_MAXSEGMENT), limiting our error reporting to a single mtu
> sized chunk.  Parameter errors that grow beyond that value are discarded.
> 
> Thanks, Eugene
> 

Add Xiao to CC list.

Hui

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.