[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201004091222.24615.eren@pardus.org.tr>
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 12:22:24 +0300
From: Eren Türkay <eren@...dus.org.tr>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: ClamAV small issues
On Friday 09 April 2010 11:30:19 am Ludwig Nussel wrote:
> Do such issues really need to be flagged as vulnerabilities? A virus
> scanner cannot detect all possible malware in any possible container
> anyways. So it's kind of natural that new releases enhance the
> methods to find even more hiding places.
>
I guess many people who deploy e-mail service with linux use ClamAV to scan
the attachments. Accordingly to ClamAV bug #1771 (CVE-2010-1311), it is
possible to crash the daemon with crafted file, which is not the intended
behavior.
I think these can be flagged as vulnerabilities. However, I am not sure if
these are critical issues. Accordingly to secunia, these are highly-critical.
Is there a standard way to classify the vulnerabilities? Do anyone know how
Secunia classifies vulnerabilities?
Regards,
--
Eren
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
