|
Message-ID: <4B968CD9.3060302@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 19:00:57 +0100 From: Jan Lieskovsky <jlieskov@...hat.com> To: "Steven M. Christey" <coley@...us.mitre.org>, Kees Cook <kees@...ntu.com> CC: Brian Stafford <brian@...fford.uklinux.net>, oss-security <oss-security@...ts.openwall.com>, libesmtp@...fford.uklinux.net, security@...ntu.com Subject: Re: CVE Request: libesmtp does not check NULL bytes in commonName Hi Steve, Kees Cook wrote: > Hello, > > I just noticed that libesmtp does not appear to handle NULL-byte CNs, as > seen with the original browser-based issue: > http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2009-2408 > > Related to this are failures in wildcard handling: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=311191 > and CN-specificity: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510202 > > Though it may be a non-issue if TLS doesn't function at all: > http://bugs.gentoo.org/213066 any progress while assigning CVE ids for these issues? From what I can tell, two should be enough: a, libESMTP doesn't properly handle NULL character in Common Name References: http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2009-2408 http://ioactive.com/pdfs/PKILayerCake.pdf (issue 2c) b, libESMTP's match_component() accepts two strings as equal if they start equal but don't have equal length => cert forgery References: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=311191 Kees, please correct me, if I omitted something. Thanks && Regards, Jan. -- Jan iankko Lieskovsky / Red Hat Security Response Team > > -Kees >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.