|
|
Message-ID: <4B968CD9.3060302@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 19:00:57 +0100
From: Jan Lieskovsky <jlieskov@...hat.com>
To: "Steven M. Christey" <coley@...us.mitre.org>, Kees Cook <kees@...ntu.com>
CC: Brian Stafford <brian@...fford.uklinux.net>,
oss-security <oss-security@...ts.openwall.com>,
libesmtp@...fford.uklinux.net, security@...ntu.com
Subject: Re: CVE Request: libesmtp does not check NULL bytes
in commonName
Hi Steve,
Kees Cook wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just noticed that libesmtp does not appear to handle NULL-byte CNs, as
> seen with the original browser-based issue:
> http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2009-2408
>
> Related to this are failures in wildcard handling:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=311191
> and CN-specificity:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510202
>
> Though it may be a non-issue if TLS doesn't function at all:
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/213066
any progress while assigning CVE ids for these issues?
From what I can tell, two should be enough:
a, libESMTP doesn't properly handle NULL character in Common Name
References:
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2009-2408
http://ioactive.com/pdfs/PKILayerCake.pdf (issue 2c)
b, libESMTP's match_component() accepts two strings as equal
if they start equal but don't have equal length => cert forgery
References:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=311191
Kees, please correct me, if I omitted something.
Thanks && Regards, Jan.
--
Jan iankko Lieskovsky / Red Hat Security Response Team
>
> -Kees
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.