[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201003050856.16793.ludwig.nussel@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 08:56:16 +0100
From: Ludwig Nussel <ludwig.nussel@...e.de>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: coley <coley@...re.org>, Simo Sorce <ssorce@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: Samba symlink 0day flaw
Josh Bressers wrote:
> As many of you have probably seen, there was a supposed Samba 0day flaw
> posted to full-disclosure and youtube.
>
> Samba has a response to this:
> http://marc.info/?l=samba-technical&m=126539387432412&w=2
>
> I'm not sure if this should get a CVE id. It is documented behavior.
> Somewhat unexpected though. I think changing the default is the right way
> to go, but it may be more of a hardening measure than a security fix.
>
> Thoughts Steve?
Any update on this? I think unexpected insecure default
configurations that surprise admins did get CVE numbers in the past.
cu
Ludwig
--
(o_ Ludwig Nussel
//\
V_/_ http://www.suse.de/
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
