[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B78E426.3070901@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 14:05:26 +0800
From: Eugene Teo <eugene@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
CC: "Steven M. Christey" <coley@...us.mitre.org>
Subject: Re: CVE request - kernel: race in ptrace
On 02/10/2010 09:02 PM, Eugene Teo wrote:
> On 02/09/2010 02:34 PM, Eugene Teo wrote:
>> Discovered by Tavis Ormandy. "The race involves interaction between a
>> tracer, a tracee and an antagonist. The tracer is tracing the tracee
>> with PTRACE_SYSCALL and waits on the tracee. In the mean time, an
>> antagonist blasts the tracee with SIGCONTs.
>>
>> The observed issue is that sometimes when the tracer attempts to
>> continue the tracee with PTRACE_SYSCALL, it gets a return value of
>> -ESRCH, indicating that the tracee is already running (or not being
>> traced). It turns out that a SIGCONT wakes up the tracee in kernel mode,
>> and for a moment the tracee's state is TASK_RUNNING then in ptrace_stop
>> we hit the condition where the tracee is found to be running (and thus
>> not traced). If the syscall is repeated, the
>> second time it usually succeeds (because by that time, the tracee has
>> been put into TASK_TRACED)."
>>
>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/2/8/327
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563073
>
> Hold on with assigning a CVE name for this. We are still investigating
> this issue.
False alarm ;)
http://marc.info/?t=126566675000008
Thanks, Eugene
--
Eugene Teo / Red Hat Security Response Team
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
