oss-security - Re: CVE requests - kernel security regressions for CVE-2009-1385/and -1389

Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4B666982.8090200@kernel.sg>
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 13:41:22 +0800
From: Eugene Teo <eugeneteo@...nel.sg>
To: "Steven M. Christey" <coley@...us.mitre.org>
CC: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: CVE requests - kernel security regressions for
 CVE-2009-1385/and -1389

On 01/01/2010 03:37 AM, Steven M. Christey wrote:
>>>> Issue #1
>>>> Fabian claimed that CVE-2009-1385 has an incorrect fix:
>>>> http://git.kernel.org/linus/ea30e11970a96cfe5e32c03a29332554573b4a10.
>>> [...]
>
> Use CVE-2009-4536

upstream commit 40a14deaf411592b57cb0720f0e8004293ab9865

>>>> Issue #2
>>>> The fix for CVE-2009-1389 regarding the r8169 driver introduces a
>>>> similar security problem as this:
>>>> http://git.kernel.org/linus/fdd7b4c3302c93f6833e338903ea77245eb510b4 is
>>>> a revert of this:
>>>> http://git.kernel.org/linus/126fa4b9ca5d9d7cb7d46f779ad3bd3631ca387c.
>>>
>>> Patches update can be found here:
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550907#c4
>
> Use CVE-2009-4537

http://marc.info/?t=126202986900002&r=1&w=2.

>> Issue #3
>> I noticed that the e1000e driver also needs a similar fix as issue #1.
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551214
>
> Use CVE-2009-4538

upstream commit b94b50289622e816adc9f94111cfc2679c80177c

Thanks, Eugene

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.