[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ocmsosjn.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:23:40 +0100
From: Florian Weimer <fw@...eb.enyo.de>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: CVE request: BIND 9 bug involving DNSSEC and the additional section
Fixed in BIND 9.6.1-P2, 9.5.2-P1 and 9.4.3-P4, per recent
announcements.
2772. [security] When validating, track whether pending data was from
the additional section or not and only return it if
validates as secure. [RT #20438]
The advisory at <https://www.isc.org/node/504> is rather unclear. The
way it is written, one would assume that the in-bailiwick checks are
bypassed as well. Is this really true? (Based on a quick look at the
patch, this seems to happen only for secure domains, that is, you need
some trust anchors.)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
