[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091117204812.05b6c155@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:48:12 +0100
From: Tomas Hoger <thoger@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: jt@....org
Subject: Re: CVE request: oping allows the disclosure of
arbitrary file contents
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:39:30 -0500 (EST) Josh Bressers wrote:
> > Does the RLIMIT_NPROC trick work against oping, or any setuid app
> > that calls setuid(getuid())?
>
> This should work for everything that calls setuid()
>
> I have a little bit about this here:
> http://www.bress.net/blog/archives/34-setuid-madness.html
My previous web search did find that one. Though set_user() doing
NPROC check is only called when new uid differs from current real uid
(so not called in setuid(getuid()) case).
--
Tomas Hoger / Red Hat Security Response Team
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
