[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090831172353.66bc00fb@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 17:23:53 +0200
From: Tomas Hoger <thoger@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: Steffen_Ullrich@...ua.de, "Steven M. Christey" <coley@...us.mitre.org>
Subject: Re: Re: CVE request: perl-IO-Socket-SSL certificate
hostname compare bug
On Sat, 29 Aug 2009 20:45:53 +0200 Steffen Ullrich
<Steffen_Ullrich@...ua.de> wrote:
> - the feature to help checking the hostname against the certificate is fairly new
Introduced in 1.14, unless I'm mistaken:
http://cpansearch.perl.org/src/SULLR/IO-Socket-SSL-1.14/Changes
It may be good to have this listed in the CVE description.
Anyway, prefix requirement is another mitigation, as one may not be
able to get valid certificate for a prefix of arbitrary host name
(though it may be easier for TLDs as .com and .net via .co and .ne).
Speaking of prefixes, has anyone checked IO-Socket-SSL for
CVE-2009-2408-like issues? If there is an issues, should it get fixed
in IO-Socket-SSL or in Net-SSLeay?
--
Tomas Hoger / Red Hat Security Response Team
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
