[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090805143054.GD3008@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 08:30:54 -0600
From: Vincent Danen <vdanen@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: coley@...re.org
Subject: Re: CVE request: XEmacs Multiple Integer Overflows
* [2009-08-05 13:53:50 +0200] Thomas Biege wrote:
>Hello,
>was a CVE-ID allocated for this issue in the meanwhile?
I don't believe so. We've not seen one, at any rate.
>On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 09:25:41AM +0200, Alex Legler wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I don't think we have a CVE for this/these issue(s) yet, so please
>> assign one/some:
>>
>> The {tiff,png,jpeg}_instantiate() functions in glyphs-eimage.c contain
>> an integer overflow, possibly leading to a heap-based buffer overflow.
>>
>> References:
>> Filed upstream as: http://tracker.xemacs.org/XEmacs/its/issue534
>>
>> http://secunia.com/advisories/35348
>> http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/1666
>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=275397
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511994
--
Vincent Danen / Red Hat Security Response Team
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
