[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1234534230.12390.8.camel@dhcp-lab-164.englab.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:10:30 +0100
From: Jan Lieskovsky <jlieskov@...hat.com>
To: Robert Buchholz <rbu@...too.org>
Cc: "Steven M. Christey" <coley@...us.mitre.org>,
oss-security <oss-security@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: CVE Request -- net-snmp (sensitive host
information disclosure)
Robert,
thanks for the correction!
Today also found out, the net-snmp-5.3.2.2 version, as shipped
with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 is not vulnerable to this
issue (due some RH specific internal patch applied in between,
which mitigates the impact of the flaw). So other vendors,
please perform your own investigation, if particular version
of net-snmp you ship is (isn't) affected.
Also checked state of ucd-snmp-4.2.5 (not sure if someone
else ship it yet), this looks NOT to be affected to this
flaw.
Regards, Jan.
--
Jan iankko Lieskovsky / Red Hat Security Response Team
On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 21:23 +0100, Robert Buchholz wrote:
> On Thursday 12 February 2009, Jan Lieskovsky wrote:
> > Affected net-snmp versions:
> > net-snmp-5.0.9 (older versions probably too) <= x <= net-snmp-5.4.2
> > (till the above upstream commit)
>
> Just to avoid confusion, upstream's latest release is 5.4.2.1, which is
> affected as well (and this could be updated in the CVE description).
>
>
> Robert
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
