Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0902111114370.22221-100000@golem.castaglia.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:16:14 -0800 (PST)
From: TJ Saunders <tj@...taglia.org>
To: <oss-security@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: CVE request for proftpd


> >As discussed there, this is a duplicate of an earlier bug:
> >
> >  http://bugs.proftpd.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3124
> >
> >and has been fixed in ProFTPD 1.3.2rc3 and later.
> 
> Oh, forgot to ask.  It looks like this would have been introduced in
> 1.3.1.  Is that correct?  So the affected versions would be
> 1.3.1 to 1.3.2rc2.

That's correct.

> Also, as I was looking at the Gentoo report, I noticed bug #3173 which
> likely also needs a CVE name (for the "encoding-dependent SQL injection
> vulnerability").

Yes; I was just about to note the same thing. =)

Cheers,
TJ

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

   The split in you is clear.  There is a part of you that knows what it
   should do, and a part that does what it feels like doing.
   
   	-John Cantwell Kiley
   
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.