[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48B3C2CB.50405@pardus.org.tr>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 11:46:03 +0300
From: Pınar Yanardağ <pinar@...dus.org.tr>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: CVE Request (ruby)
Jan Lieskovsky wrote On 25-08-2008 16:20:
> Hello Steve,
>
> Ruby upstream has announced another security flaw
> (DoS vulnerability in REXML module):
>
> http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2008/08/23/dos-vulnerability-in-rexml/
>
> Test case available in part: "Impact".
>
> Proposed preliminary fix: http://www.ruby-lang.org/security/20080823rexml/rexml-expansion-fix.rb
>
There is an ongoing discussion on comp.lang.ruby about announcing this
flaw more focused on Rails more than Ruby. [1] I am agree the majority
of vulnerable apps are Rails' but there is still no update for Ruby's
standart library in 3 days, though.
[1]:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.ruby/browse_thread/thread/19f69e8a081fc0d1/e138e014b74352ca?#e138e014b74352ca
> Testing status: REXML parsing of provided *.xml file causes
> 100% cpu usage for about 1 and 1/4 minutes
> (checked the ruby-1.8.5-5.5 case).
>
> Could you please assign a CVE id for it?
>
> Thank you in advance.
>
> Kind regards
> Jan iankko Lieskovsky
> RH Security Response Team
>
>
Regards,
--
Pınar Yanardağ
http://pinguar.org
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
