[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080721084911.34e5b98b@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 08:49:11 +0200
From: Tomas Hoger <thoger@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: smithj@...ethemallocs.com, coley@...us.mitre.org,
Bram Moolenaar
<Bram@...lenaar.net>,
"Charles E Campbell, Jr" <drchip@...pbellfamily.biz>,
Jan Minar <rdancer@...ncer.org>
Subject: Re: Re: More arbitrary code executions in Netrw
version 125, Vim 7.2a.10
On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 11:12:42 -0800 Jonathan Smith
<smithj@...ethemallocs.com> wrote:
> Tomas Hoger wrote:
> > Jonathan, did new netrw tests work for you? With which vim version?
> > They all failed for me with vim 7.1.245 / netrw 109.
>
> No vulnerability was found for me for vim 7.1.213 with netrw 109, as
> compiled for rPath Linux.
Even with jjD instead of jD in do_tiocsti?
--
Tomas Hoger / Red Hat Security Response Team
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
