[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080519202636.GL12850@outflux.net>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 13:26:36 -0700
From: Kees Cook <kees@...flux.net>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: OpenSSH key blacklisting
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 04:06:55AM +0400, Solar Designer wrote:
> Also, aren't protocol 1 keys 1024-bit RSA only, even with the latest
> ssh-keygen?
>
> Then, is it just one set of vulnerable 1024-bit RSA keys for both
> protocols - or is it two sets?
Yes -- in the tests I did, RSA1 and RSA keys shared the same modulus,
so RSA1 is covered by the same blacklists. RSA1024 is in the
openssh-blacklist-extra binary package in debian.
As for other corner-cases, DSA2048 weren't generate-able[1] with a broken
version of ssh-keygen, so I've been considering publishing an _empty_
DSA2048 blacklist, just so that ssh-vulnkey will report DSA2048 as "safe"
instead of "unknown".
-Kees
[1] dsa was forced to be 1024 for a while now:
$ ssh-keygen -f /tmp/foo -t dsa -b 2048
DSA keys must be 1024 bits
--
Kees Cook @outflux.net
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
