![]() |
|
Message-ID: <20250209140424.GX10433@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2025 09:04:24 -0500 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> To: Yao Zi <ziyao@...root.org> Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] ldso: don't reclaim zero-memory-sized segments On Sat, Feb 08, 2025 at 05:51:01AM +0000, Yao Zi wrote: > On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 03:44:47AM +0000, Yao Zi wrote: > > Some weird linkers may emit PT_LOAD segments with memsz = 0. ELF > > specification does not forbid this, but such a segment with non-zero > > p_vaddr will result in reclaiming of invalid memory address. > > > > This patch skips such segments during reclaiming for better > > compatibility. > > Ping on this patch, someone has been hitting this[1]. > > Thanks for your time and review! > > > Signed-off-by: Yao Zi <ziyao@...root.org> > > --- > > ldso/dynlink.c | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/ldso/dynlink.c b/ldso/dynlink.c > > index 3b57c07f..715948f4 100644 > > --- a/ldso/dynlink.c > > +++ b/ldso/dynlink.c > > @@ -616,6 +616,7 @@ static void reclaim_gaps(struct dso *dso) > > for (; phcnt--; ph=(void *)((char *)ph+dso->phentsize)) { > > if (ph->p_type!=PT_LOAD) continue; > > if ((ph->p_flags&(PF_R|PF_W))!=(PF_R|PF_W)) continue; > > + if (ph->p_memsz == 0) continue; > > reclaim(dso, ph->p_vaddr & -PAGE_SIZE, ph->p_vaddr); > > reclaim(dso, ph->p_vaddr+ph->p_memsz, > > ph->p_vaddr+ph->p_memsz+PAGE_SIZE-1 & -PAGE_SIZE); > > -- > > 2.46.0 > > > > [1]: https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/tinycc-devel/2024-10/msg00012.html Thanks for the ping. Applying.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.