|
Message-ID: <6e084b55f3f0fc02b1a8e1b3997e5d81@ispras.ru> Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2024 12:43:00 +0300 From: Alexey Izbyshev <izbyshev@...ras.ru> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Cc: Natanael Copa <ncopa@...inelinux.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] add close_range() syscall wrapper On 2023-09-01 17:58, Natanael Copa wrote: > close_range() is a syscall present in FreeBSD 8.0 and Linux 5.9. glibc > 2.34 added a wrapper. > > Expose it under _GNU_SOURCE similar to what GNU libc does. Also expose > it under _BSD_SOURCE since it is also a FreeBSD function. > --- > > v2: use syscall without __syscall_ret > > include/unistd.h | 3 +++ > src/linux/close_range.c | 8 ++++++++ > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 src/linux/close_range.c > > diff --git a/include/unistd.h b/include/unistd.h > index 5bc7f798..d89e3d4c 100644 > --- a/include/unistd.h > +++ b/include/unistd.h > @@ -161,6 +161,9 @@ unsigned ualarm(unsigned, unsigned); > #define L_INCR 1 > #define L_XTND 2 > int brk(void *); > +#define CLOSE_RANGE_UNSHARE (1U << 1) > +#define CLOSE_RANGE_CLOEXEC (1U << 2) > +int close_range(unsigned int, unsigned int, int); > void *sbrk(intptr_t); > pid_t vfork(void); > int vhangup(void); > diff --git a/src/linux/close_range.c b/src/linux/close_range.c > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000..3f1378a0 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/src/linux/close_range.c > @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ > +#define _GNU_SOURCE > +#include <unistd.h> > +#include "syscall.h" > + > +int close_range(unsigned int first, unsigned int last, int flags) > +{ > + return syscall(SYS_close_range, first, last, flags); > +} Regarding FreeBSD, close_range was added not in 8.0, but in 13.0 [1], and also backported to 12.2 [2]. Otherwise, this patch looks good to me. Rich, is it possible to consider close_range wrapper inclusion again? Apart from FreeBSD and glibc, bionic has it too. A cursory Debian code search shows that close_range libc wrapper can be used at least by openssh, libvirt, network-manager, openrc, qemu, lxc, rsyslog packages (in addition to CPython that I mentioned ealier). As for having a fallback in case the syscall is unavailable, I'm not aware of anybody implementing it, so I'd expect all close_range users to implement their own fallback/error handling. For example, Debian's openssh migrated from closefrom to close_range with their own fallback because of too aggressive closefrom fallback in glibc[3]. Thanks, Alexey [1] https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?h=releng/13.0&id=472ced39efb537374068f06b348fe5dac389c45a [2] https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?h=releng/12.2&id=a80adba5ab46ba6d44d5abfc9b7f3b6de8afda55 [3] https://sources.debian.org/src/openssh/1%3A9.8p1-1/debian/changelog/#L895
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.