musl - Re: roundf() (and round(), and ...)

Message-ID: <1979c367-4722-48b2-d736-c3e639e47f74@esi.com.au>
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 14:32:11 +1000 (AEST)
From: Damian McGuckin <damianm@....com.au>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: roundf() (and round(), and ...)

As an aside, the current round(), roundf() and roundl() routines raise an 
exception for non-integral arguments.

I believe that this is incorrect according to the latest IEEE 754 and C2Y.

Should it be changed?

Thanks - Damian

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.