![]() |
|
Message-ID: <20240613152931.GX10433@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 11:29:31 -0400 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> To: erny hombre <hombre67@....at> Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Re: possible bug in syslog On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 04:51:59PM +0200, erny hombre wrote: > Hello, > > Rich wrote: > > This assertion itself is not valid; the whole reason a LOG_MAKEPRI > > macro exists is that it's not guaranteed that the packing be > > simple or. > > Here > (https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799.2018edition/functions/syslog.html) > I found this: > Values of the priority argument are formed by OR'ing together a > severity-level value and an optional facility value. > > So I think a simple or should be correct. Oh, I completely missed that and thought this was an extension. Indeed, it's the LOG_MAKEPRI thing that's nonstandard way to do something that already has a standard way to do it, and since our definition of it is wrong, it just needs to be fixed. Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.