|
Message-ID: <41b401d59b3846f44cee33f1d680b2534b7c0dea.camel@intel.com> Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 04:18:02 +0000 From: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com> To: "dalias@...c.org" <dalias@...c.org> CC: "linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, "suzuki.poulose@....com" <suzuki.poulose@....com>, "Szabolcs.Nagy@....com" <Szabolcs.Nagy@....com>, "musl@...ts.openwall.com" <musl@...ts.openwall.com>, "linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, "kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev" <kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev>, "corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>, "broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>, "oliver.upton@...ux.dev" <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>, "palmer@...belt.com" <palmer@...belt.com>, "debug@...osinc.com" <debug@...osinc.com>, "aou@...s.berkeley.edu" <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, "shuah@...nel.org" <shuah@...nel.org>, "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>, "maz@...nel.org" <maz@...nel.org>, "oleg@...hat.com" <oleg@...hat.com>, "fweimer@...hat.com" <fweimer@...hat.com>, "keescook@...omium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>, "james.morse@....com" <james.morse@....com>, "ebiederm@...ssion.com" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, "will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>, "brauner@...nel.org" <brauner@...nel.org>, "hjl.tools@...il.com" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, "linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, "paul.walmsley@...ive.com" <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, "ardb@...nel.org" <ardb@...nel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>, "thiago.bauermann@...aro.org" <thiago.bauermann@...aro.org>, "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "sorear@...tmail.com" <sorear@...tmail.com>, "linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v8 00/38] arm64/gcs: Provide support for GCS in userspace On Tue, 2024-02-20 at 18:11 -0800, Rick Edgecombe wrote: > Some specific cases that were still open were longjmp()ing off of a > custom userspace threading library stack, which may not have left a > token behind when it jumped to a new stack. And also, potentially off > of an alt shadow stack in the future, depending on whether it leaves > a > restore token when handling a signal. (the problem there, is if there > is no room to leave it). Ah, I remember the other one. If the token on the target shadow stack is at the end of the shadow stack, it may not be able to handle pushing a shadow stack signal frame if a signal hits while is unwinding through the token. As in, where normal longjmp() is direct transition, in this case the longjmp() operation can be temporarily in a place where a signal cannot be handled.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.