|
Message-ID: <ZWrvem7pTxtOkQUq@voyager> Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2023 09:48:58 +0100 From: Markus Wichmann <nullplan@....net> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Cc: Anuraag Agrawal <anuraaga@...il.com> Subject: Re: Large overflow in __intscan ignored Am Sat, Dec 02, 2023 at 10:42:11AM +0900 schrieb Anuraag Agrawal: > Hello, > > Thanks for checking and very sorry for the noise, I didn't read the loop > condition correctly. I am using Webassembly so the issue must be specific > to it somehow. I will report on wasi-libc to follow up. > > Thanks, Don't worry about it. The only way I see this could overflow is if ULLONG_MAX is not the correct limit for what the compiler implements as "unsigned long long". Though I don't see how that could be, since musl defines ULLONG_MAX as the minimum value the type can have according to the C standard. Or else, of course, maybe the compiler's implementation of 64-bit multiplication is broken. Ciao, Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.