[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <be804496-1e62-4781-fc68-72e4c7ebe363@landley.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 11:43:52 -0500
From: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com,
Matheus Tavares Bernardino <quic_mathbern@...cinc.com>
Cc: Brian Cain <bcain@...cinc.com>, Sid Manning <sidneym@...cinc.com>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>, Fangrui Song <i@...kray.me>,
Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Add support to Hexagon DSP
On 8/30/23 07:22, Matheus Tavares Bernardino wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to restart the conversations from
> https://marc.info/?l=musl&w=2&r=1&s=Hexagon+DSP+support&q=b about
> adding Hexagon support to musl.
>
> I've read the comments from the two previous iterations and it looks
> like Sid has addressed them all already (please let me know if there is
> something missing, though). So I've only rebased/reorganized the patches
> with minor cleanup changes.
>
> These patches are also available at my git tree:
> https://github.com/quic/musl/tree/mathbern/to-upstream
Is there a current toolchain build script for hexagon? I harvested an
llvm+hexagon+musl build out of qemu's test suite a year or two back
(https://www.openwall.com/lists/musl/2021/07/25/2), but when I pulled updated
llvm git versions a few months later the build faceplanted hard in a way that
wasn't obvious to me how to fix.
(I'm under the impression hexagon is still llvm-only, gcc support having been
dropped in favor of llvm some years ago...)
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
