Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230524143408.GA4163@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 10:34:08 -0400
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
To: Jₑₙₛ Gustedt <jens.gustedt@...ia.fr>
Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [C23 divers headers 16/17] C23: add the nullptr_t type

On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 04:29:16PM +0200, Jₑₙₛ Gustedt wrote:
> Rich,
> 
> on Wed, 24 May 2023 10:22:01 -0400 you (Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>)
> wrote:
> 
> > nullptr_t is not defined pre-C23 so the __clang__ branch shouldn't be
> > there.
> 
> Well, if I do that, such a change is impossible to test, because there
> are not yet any compilers with that version number. How should we do
> that, then? Have a test for >= 201800L or so?

I'm not really convinced this needs testing at this point (what even
is a test testing, if not that the right version results in the
definition being present?), but what does existing -std=c2x or
whatever set the version to? Could probably use >= that instead of >=
the official C23 version.

Rich

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.