|
Message-ID: <11995006.zapYfy813O@nimes> Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 01:29:47 +0100 From: Bruno Haible <bruno@...sp.org> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: swprintf: minimum width ignored for %lc On musl-1.2.3 I see this violation of the POSIX specification of swprintf [1]: ==================================== foo1.c ==================================== #include <stdio.h> #include <wchar.h> int main () { static wint_t L_x = (wchar_t) 'x'; wchar_t buf[12] = { 0xDEADBEEF, 0xDEADBEEF, 0xDEADBEEF, 0xDEADBEEF, 0xDEADBEEF, 0xDEADBEEF, 0xDEADBEEF, 0xDEADBEEF, 0xDEADBEEF, 0xDEADBEEF, 0xDEADBEEF, 0xDEADBEEF }; int ret = swprintf (buf, 12, L"%10lc", L_x); printf ("ret = %d, buf[0] = 0x%x, buf[1] = 0x%x, buf[9] = 0x%x, buf[10] = 0x%x, buf[11] = 0x%x\n", ret, (unsigned int) buf[0], (unsigned int) buf[1], (unsigned int) buf[9], (unsigned int) buf[10], (unsigned int) buf[11]); return 0; } /* glibc: ret = 10, buf[0] = 0x20, buf[1] = 0x20, buf[9] = 0x78, buf[10] = 0x0, buf[11] = 0xdeadbeef musl libc: ret = 1, buf[0] = 0x78, buf[1] = 0x0, buf[9] = 0xdeadbeef, buf[10] = 0xdeadbeef, buf[11] = 0xdeadbeef */ ================================================================================ $ gcc -Wall foo1.c $ ./a.out ret = 1, buf[0] = 0x78, buf[1] = 0x0, buf[9] = 0xdeadbeef, buf[10] = 0xdeadbeef, buf[11] = 0xdeadbeef The POSIX specification [1] says: "An optional minimum field width. If the converted value has fewer wide characters than the field width, it shall be padded with <space> characters by default on the left; it shall be padded on the right, if the left- adjustment flag ( '-' ), described below, is given to the field width. The field width takes the form of an <asterisk> ( '*' ), described below, or a decimal integer." Here, the minimum field width specification of 10 was apparently ignored. For comparison, in snprintf, this case is handled correctly: ==================================== foo2.c ==================================== #include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> #include <wchar.h> int main () { static wint_t L_x = (wchar_t) 'x'; char buf[12] = { 0xDD, 0xDD, 0xDD, 0xDD, 0xDD, 0xDD, 0xDD, 0xDD, 0xDD, 0xDD, 0xDD, 0xDD }; int ret = snprintf (buf, 12, "%10lc", L_x); printf ("ret = %d, buf[0] = 0x%x, buf[1] = 0x%x, buf[9] = 0x%x, buf[10] = 0x%x, buf[11] = 0x%x\n", ret, (unsigned char) buf[0], (unsigned char) buf[1], (unsigned char) buf[9], (unsigned char) buf[10], (unsigned char) buf[11]); return 0; } /* glibc: ret = 10, buf[0] = 0x20, buf[1] = 0x20, buf[9] = 0x78, buf[10] = 0x0, buf[11] = 0xdd musl libc: ret = 10, buf[0] = 0x20, buf[1] = 0x20, buf[9] = 0x78, buf[10] = 0x0, buf[11] = 0xdd */ ================================================================================ $ gcc -Wall foo1.c $ ./a.out ret = 10, buf[0] = 0x20, buf[1] = 0x20, buf[9] = 0x78, buf[10] = 0x0, buf[11] = 0xdd Bruno [1] https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/swprintf.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.