[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2bd98ffc-f82f-a11d-b14a-15226f1ebf4a@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 13:20:50 -0700
From: Khem Raj <raj.khem@...il.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: remove SIGSTKFLT on mips?
On 5/21/20 12:21 PM, Rich Felker wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 09:51:29AM -0700, enh wrote:
>> (context: https://github.com/landley/toybox/issues/194)
>>
>> seems like musl defines SIGSTKFLT for mips as signal 7. the kernel
>> disagrees and says SIGEMT is 7, and that mips doesn't have a
>> SIGSTKFLT:
>>
>> arch/mips/include/uapi/asm/signal.h:#define SIGEMT 7
>>
>> git blame says SIGSTKFLT was introduced in the original commit:
>>
>> commit 6315004f6102dca44c4ba50654a36967b8b9c2a6
>> Author: Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx>
>> Date: Wed Jul 11 04:22:13 2012 -0400
>>
>> initial version of mips (o32) port, based on work by Richard
>> Pennington (rdp)
>>
>> basically, this version of the code was obtained by starting with
>> rdp's work from his ellcc source tree, adapting it to musl's build
>> system and coding style, auditing the bits headers for discrepencies
>> with kernel definitions or glibc/LSB ABI or large file issues, fixing
>> up incompatibility with the old binutils from aboriginal linux, and
>> adding some new special cases to deal with the oddities of sigaction
>> and pipe syscall interfaces on mips.
>>
>> at present, minimal test programs work, but some interfaces are broken
>> or missing. threaded programs probably will not link.
>
> I have the two attached patches pending push if there's no objection.
>
seems good to me
> Rich
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
