|
Message-ID: <20190806175006.GZ9017@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 13:50:06 -0400 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] remove riscv64 user_regs_struct On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 08:47:29PM +0300, Baruch Siach wrote: > user_regs_struct removal fixes possible conflict with the kernel > definition of the same struct in asm/ptrace.h. glibc does not define > user_regs_struct for riscv either. > --- > v2: Remove user_regs_struct entirely following feedback from Rich and > Szabolcs > --- > arch/riscv64/bits/user.h | 35 ----------------------------------- > 1 file changed, 35 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/riscv64/bits/user.h b/arch/riscv64/bits/user.h > index bd0f0fc7027f..d2e383b24e53 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv64/bits/user.h > +++ b/arch/riscv64/bits/user.h > @@ -1,38 +1,3 @@ > -struct user_regs_struct { > - unsigned long pc; > - unsigned long ra; > - unsigned long sp; > - unsigned long gp; > - unsigned long tp; > - unsigned long t0; > - unsigned long t1; > - unsigned long t2; > - unsigned long s0; > - unsigned long s1; > - unsigned long a0; > - unsigned long a1; > - unsigned long a2; > - unsigned long a3; > - unsigned long a4; > - unsigned long a5; > - unsigned long a6; > - unsigned long a7; > - unsigned long s2; > - unsigned long s3; > - unsigned long s4; > - unsigned long s5; > - unsigned long s6; > - unsigned long s7; > - unsigned long s8; > - unsigned long s9; > - unsigned long s10; > - unsigned long s11; > - unsigned long t3; > - unsigned long t4; > - unsigned long t5; > - unsigned long t6; > -}; > - > struct user_fpregs_struct { > double f[32]; > unsigned int fcsr; > -- > 2.20.1 It's not just that struct but the whole file. I've got the removal already committed here though, pending push with a queue of stuff from the list. Thanks. Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.