|
Message-ID: <20190326150901.GA2267@homura.localdomain> Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 11:09:01 -0400 From: Drew DeVault <sir@...wn.com> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Supporting git access via smart HTTPS protocol for musl-libc On 2019-03-26 11:04 AM, Rich Felker wrote: > > Also I find you are providing https version of git.musl-libc.org site. > > thttpd does not supports https. Are you using stunnel for it? > > I'm presently using haproxy's TLS-layer (vs HTTPS-layer) proxying, > because stunnel suggers from a 2.5-decades-old wrong handling of TCP > connection closing that makes it unusable, and because haproxy is what > I knew at the time. I think openssl s_server could handle it too, but > might not support SNI (?). What I'd really prefer is a non-broken > stunnel workalike using BearSSL as the backend, since BearSSL is the > only non-awful TLS implementation. If anyone wants to work on > something like that I'd be happy to test and eventually dogfood it on > musl site. If a working haproxy solution is already in place, why not rig it up for cloning as well? What's the old phrase - perfect is the enemy of good, or something like that.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.