|
Message-ID: <CAEg67GnJBwVjDmwwVW=8hMx3ig757G6K+e3qS6YmryLedpyC4w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2018 11:23:11 +1000
From: Patrick Oppenlander <patrick.oppenlander@...il.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SYS_futex FUTEX_WAIT requires a valid timeout argument
On Fri., 1 Jun. 2018, 11:01 Rich Felker, <dalias@...c.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 10:49:20AM +1000, patrick.oppenlander@...il.com
> wrote:
> > From: Patrick Oppenlander <patrick.oppenlander@...il.com>
> >
> > ---
> > src/internal/pthread_impl.h | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/src/internal/pthread_impl.h b/src/internal/pthread_impl.h
> > index fc2def63..97522bfe 100644
> > --- a/src/internal/pthread_impl.h
> > +++ b/src/internal/pthread_impl.h
> > @@ -155,8 +155,8 @@ static inline void __wake(volatile void *addr, int
> cnt, int priv)
> > static inline void __futexwait(volatile void *addr, int val, int priv)
> > {
> > if (priv) priv = FUTEX_PRIVATE;
> > - __syscall(SYS_futex, addr, FUTEX_WAIT|priv, val) != -ENOSYS ||
> > - __syscall(SYS_futex, addr, FUTEX_WAIT, val);
> > + __syscall(SYS_futex, addr, FUTEX_WAIT|priv, val, 0) != -ENOSYS ||
> > + __syscall(SYS_futex, addr, FUTEX_WAIT, val, 0);
> > }
> >
> > void __acquire_ptc(void);
> > --
> > 2.17.0
>
> This looks correct. Did you hit things that broke because it was
> missing?
>
> Rich
>
Syscall argument validation in my nommu kernel caught it. I'm sure Linux
would catch it too.
I didn't prove that it causes observable issues in userspace.
Patrick
>
Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.