Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180419182743.GP4418@port70.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 20:27:44 +0200
From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: tcmalloc compatibility

* Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> [2018-04-18 16:35:56 -0400]:
> Today I pushed changes which should make malloc
> replacement/interposition work reliably as long as you only use
> AS-safe functions. If you try this, please let us know how it turns
> out and if you run into any unexpected problems.

there was a report on irc that this change in memalign has falsepositives:

-       if (len > SIZE_MAX - align) {
+       if (len > SIZE_MAX - align || free != __internal_free) {

in particular &free can point to a plt entry in the main executable
while &__internal_free is in libc.so so they compare unequal.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.