musl - expectations for a_ctz

Message-ID: <CAJ86T=U+E_tAZQLro1pXSXoXsGfWE0H=9m94XCYJjnPQUv7A5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 14:41:32 -0800
From: Andre McCurdy <armccurdy@...il.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: expectations for a_ctz_64(0)

Currently the generic and aarch64 versions of a_ctz_64() give
different results for 0:

  a_ctz_64_generic(0) : 0
  a_ctz_64_aarch64(0) : 64

That doesn't matter for the ffs functions, but for the other users of
a_ctz_l and a_ctz_64 (ie malloc and qsort) it's less clear.

Does musl rely on a specific behaviour?

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.