Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170615001626.GM1627@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 20:16:26 -0400
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: valgrind memcheck + drd error on alpine 3.6 container

On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 07:51:30PM +0200, Eugenio Pérez wrote:
> Hi, everyone!
> 
> I'm having an issue trying to use valgrind drd in the simplest musl-linked
> program (just return 0).
> 
> drd refuses to even run main, and give me this error:
> 
> ==24== drd, a thread error detector
> ==24== Copyright (C) 2006-2015, and GNU GPL'd, by Bart Van Assche.
> ==24== Using Valgrind-3.12.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info
> ==24== Command: ./f2k
> ==24==
> 
> drd: drd_malloc_wrappers.c:115 (handle_free): Assertion 'success' failed.
> 
> host stacktrace:
> ==24==    at 0x3805EF1D: show_sched_status_wrk (m_libcassert.c:343)
> ==24==    by 0x3805F208: report_and_quit (m_libcassert.c:419)
> ==24==    by 0x3805F3E9: vgPlain_assert_fail (m_libcassert.c:485)
> ==24==    by 0x38057635: handle_free (drd_malloc_wrappers.c:115)
> ==24==    by 0x380A51B9: do_client_request (scheduler.c:1861)
> ==24==    by 0x380A51B9: vgPlain_scheduler (scheduler.c:1425)
> ==24==    by 0x380B25DA: thread_wrapper (syswrap-linux.c:103)
> ==24==    by 0x380B25DA: run_a_thread_NORETURN (syswrap-linux.c:156)
> 
> sched status:
>   running_tid=1
> 
> Thread 1: status = VgTs_Runnable (lwpid 24)
> ==24==    at 0x4C96951: free (vg_replace_malloc.c:530)
> ==24==    by 0x4057A19: ??? (in /lib/ld-musl-x86_64.so.1)
> 
> I would like to compare it with glibc, but I'm unable to use it in alpine
> linux properly. If it helps, memcheck gives me  this error:
> 
> ==163== Invalid free() / delete / delete[] / realloc()
> ==163==    at 0x4C939EA: free (vg_replace_malloc.c:530)
> ==163==    by 0x4057A19: ??? (in /lib/ld-musl-x86_64.so.1)
> ==163==  Address 0x4e9b180 is in a rw- mapped file
> /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so segment
> ==163==
> ==163==
> ==163== HEAP SUMMARY:
> ==163==     in use at exit: 404 bytes in 1 blocks
> ==163==   total heap usage: 1 allocs, 1 frees, 404 bytes allocated
> ==163==
> ==163== 404 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 1 of 1
> ==163==    at 0x4C9461F: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:711)
> ==163==    by 0x4058B45: ??? (in /lib/ld-musl-x86_64.so.1)
> ==163==    by 0x4059774: __dls3 (in /lib/ld-musl-x86_64.so.1)
> ==163==    by 0xFFF000CB7: ???
> ==163==    by 0xFFF000D27: ???
> ==163==
> ==163== LEAK SUMMARY:
> ==163==    definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
> ==163==    indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
> ==163==      possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
> ==163==    still reachable: 404 bytes in 1 blocks
> ==163==         suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
> 
> And that is before even reach main() function! However, memchecks continue
> after error; drd does not. ¿What could I do to keep diagnosing this error?
> 
> Thanks and regards!

It's not an error, just lack of a suppressions file. You can ignore it
or figure out how to write the suppressions file, or get one from
somewhere (maybe a distro) that's already done it for musl.

Rich

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.