|
Message-ID: <20170117193947.GG1533@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 14:39:47 -0500 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Re: Implementation of GLOB_TILDE On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 03:49:03PM +0000, Bernardo Pascoal Figueiredo wrote: > >I have a few questions though: > > * How do I contribute to musl? Should I just send patches to this > >mailing list This is the preferred way, yes. > > * I defined GLOB_TILDE as 0x100, but I think this won't work on > >architectures > > that have sizeof(int) == 2, as the flags argument in glob is an int. That's not an issue. (1) POSIX requires >=32bit int; musl is even more restrictive. (2) 0xff is 8 bits, not 16. Even ISO C requires 0x100 to fit in int. You do need to match whatever value glibc uses, though; I haven't checked that. > > * I think it's best to define GLOB_TILDE in glob.h inside a '#if > > defined(_GNU_SOURCE) || defined(_BSD_SOURCE)' what do you think? > > > > * I had to copy strlcat and strlcpy to glob.c so I could use > >them. I had to do > > this because musl isn't compile as _GNU_SOURCE or _BSD_SOURCE > >so string.h > > doesn't expose these functions. How should I fix this? Just don't use them. The same thing can be achieved much better with portable functions strnlen and memcpy. Note that even if you added #define for _GNU_SOURCE to this file, you couldn't reference these functions because then a function in the standard namespace would depend on symbols in nonstandard namespace. > diff --git a/src/regex/glob.c b/src/regex/glob.c > index 5b6ff124..f40da380 100644 > --- a/src/regex/glob.c > +++ b/src/regex/glob.c > @@ -8,6 +8,9 @@ > #include <errno.h> > #include <stddef.h> > #include "libc.h" > +#include <stdbool.h> Just use int for boolean values; bool is not idiomatic in musl. > +/*"~" or "~/(...)" case*/ > +static bool expand_tilde_cur_user(const char *pat_after_tilde, char *new_pat, size_t new_pat_size) > +{ > + char *home; > + struct passwd pw_store, *pw_result; > + char pw_buf[1024]; > + > + /*FIXME: add check for issetugid as in libc of openbsd?*/ > + home = getenv("HOME"); > + if(home == NULL) { > + getpwuid_r(getuid(), &pw_store, pw_buf, sizeof(pw_buf), &pw_result); > + if(pw_result == NULL) { > + return false; > + } > + home = pw_store.pw_dir; > + } > + > + return glob_strlcpy(new_pat, home, new_pat_size) < new_pat_size > + && glob_strlcat(new_pat, pat_after_tilde, new_pat_size) < new_pat_size; > +} > + > +/* "~user/(...) case*/ > +static bool expand_tilde_named_user(const char *pat_after_tilde, char *new_pat, size_t new_pat_size) > +{ > + struct passwd pw_store, *pw_result; > + char pw_buf[1024], username[1024]; > + const char *slash_pos = strchr(pat_after_tilde, '/'); > + if(slash_pos == NULL) { > + return false; > + } > + > + ptrdiff_t pat_username_size = slash_pos - pat_after_tilde; > + if(pat_username_size <= 0 || pat_username_size >= sizeof(username)) { > + return false; > + } > + strncpy(username, pat_after_tilde, pat_username_size); > + username[pat_username_size] = '\0'; > + > + getpwnam_r(username, &pw_store, pw_buf, sizeof(pw_buf), &pw_result); > + if (pw_result == NULL) > + return false; > + > + return glob_strlcpy(new_pat, pw_store.pw_dir, new_pat_size) < new_pat_size > + && glob_strlcat(new_pat, slash_pos, new_pat_size) < new_pat_size; > +} It should be possible to reduce this code considerably, and to avoid some of the large stack buffers. Certainly username[] does not need to be 1k; I believe there's a macro for the max supported in limits.h or such and it's something like 16 or 32 bytes. > int glob(const char *restrict pat, int flags, int (*errfunc)(const char *path, int err), glob_t *restrict g) > { > - const char *p=pat, *d; > + const char *p, *d; > + char new_pat[PATH_MAX + 1]; > struct match head = { .next = NULL }, *tail = &head; > size_t cnt, i; > size_t offs = (flags & GLOB_DOOFFS) ? g->gl_offs : 0; > int error = 0; > + > + /*even if expanding fails(e.g. expansion make pat too big) > + * we should try to match the ~ or ~user literally*/ > + bool should_expand_tilde = (flags & GLOB_TILDE) && (pat[0] == '~'); > + if(should_expand_tilde && expand_tilde(pat, new_pat, sizeof(new_pat))) { > + p = new_pat; > + } else { > + p = pat; > + } Don't introduce gratuitous variables for expressions used just once. The conditions going into that bool can just be part of the if. I haven't checked what happens when the input pat is too long to fit in new_pat. This needs to be an error condition, not silent truncation, but error conditions can't be handled until further down; see commit 769f53598e781ffc89191520f3f8a93cb58db91f for why. Also, new_pat should probably be a VLA whose length is 1 unless tilde expansion is needed, and PATH_MAX otherwise, so that glob doesn't blow an extra page on the stack when tilde expansion is not in use. Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.