[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <EB91C8D3-CB47-4E49-AFC2-EF7F018A0AEB@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 20:49:04 -0700
From: Khem Raj <raj.khem@...il.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: robust mutex support
> On Mar 17, 2016, at 8:43 PM, Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 06:28:31PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> We are missing robust mutexes in musl, there are packages which depend on them, one of
>> the package that I ran across recently is apache portable runtime ( apr ) as well as
>> linux rt-tests package. There might be more, but I think its a desirable feature to have
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
> I think you mean priority inheritance. musl has had robust mutex
> support since roughly a month after the initial release in 2011. :)
>
ah yes that was an oversight. I did mean PI mutex
> Rich
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (205 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
