[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160318034622.GM21636@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 23:46:23 -0400
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Add support for amd64 target
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 10:33:41PM -0400, Michael McConville wrote:
> AMD64 and x86-64 are effectively interchangeable terms. BSDs use the
> prior while Linux uses the latter. The below patch therefore fixes
> configure on OpenBSD.
I'm not opposed to adding this if you think it will help, but I'm
skeptical of whether a toolchain targeting OpenBSD can produce a
working musl build anyway. Are you trying to get something that runs
on OpenBSD or use the OpenBSD compiler as a makeshift cross compiler
to get a normal Linux build?
> For what it's worth, the build then survives until linking. I haven't
> had a chance to diagnose that problem yet.
What are the linker errors you hit? It's not surprising that compiling
would work since no files external to the musl source tree are
accessed during compiling, but linking could bring in lots of issues,
and runtime even more.
Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
