Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACsECNeJVFAf6-k4pai2rJVjLLJm4orcJrkQ+6TGiETNPOukyA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 16:25:47 +0200
From: Alex <alexinbeijing@...il.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9] Build process uses script to add CFI directives
 to x86 asm

On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 4:16 PM, Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> wrote:
> A nasty complication: some of the .sub files sub-in a .c file instead
> of a .s file. This is horribly nasty and probably not something I
> should have done. x86 is not affected, but it probably means we should
> not try applying the CFI stuff in the makefile to .sub rules yet.

You are absolutely right about this. I will remove those Makefile rules. -- AD

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.