|
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdU3dM=UEUfgmEao=xJh=qocVfKZmxgbesWieb223B=o9w@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 08:24:17 +0200 From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> To: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> Cc: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>, musl@...ts.openwall.com, libc-alpha@...rceware.org, Linux-sh list <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: SH sigcontext ABI is broken On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:34 PM, Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> wrote: >> I want musl to support sh2 but I _also_ want it to support coldfire and >> h8300 and so on. If musl is the successor to uclibc (which needs to be >> put out of its misery), it needs nommu support for several different >> architectures. If you insist that every nommu architecture must also run >> those nommu binaries on with-mmu sibling architectures, you're going to >> be unifying coldfire and m68k next... > > If you look at the kernel I'm pretty sure that already works... > Coldfire does not seem to be a separate arch/ABI as far as the kernel > is concerned. Off-topic, but: 1. While the Coldfire user mode instruction set is (more or less?) a subset of the classic m68k user mode instruction set, there are larger differences in the supervisor mode instruction sets. 2. Coldfire uses a different MMU than classic m68k. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.