[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150616192847.GI1173@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 15:28:47 -0400
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
To: netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH iptables RFC 4/4] libxt_TCPOPTSTRIP: Use local
copy of TCPOPTS constants
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 09:25:04PM +0200, Felix Janda wrote:
> musl does not provide these constants in <netinet/tcp.h>
>
> Signed-off-by: Felix Janda <felix.janda@...teo.de>
> ---
> It is not clear to me whether these constants belong to iptables or musl's
> netinet/tcp.h. So this message is CC'd to the musl list.
>
> In the code indexed by debian code search I have only found iptables and
> traceroute using them without having a local copy of tcp.h.
>
> Note that this patch is incomplete: utils/nfsynproxy.c uses them as well
I'm not sure either. I'd like to hear from someone who has a good
argument one way or the other.
Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
