|
Message-ID: <20150602094135.GB10927@port70.net> Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 11:41:35 +0200 From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: time.h define NULL * Daniel Cegie??ka <daniel.cegielka@...il.com> [2015-06-02 11:38:46 +0200]: > 2015-06-02 11:35 GMT+02:00 Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net>: > > > > * Tomasz Sterna <tomek@...oka.com> [2015-06-02 11:09:40 +0200]: > > > Why does time.h unconditionally define NULL [1]? > > > > because it is required > > > > > It gives me the following warning during compilation: > > > > > > In file included from /usr/include/pthread.h:31: > > > /usr/include/time.h:11:9: warning: 'NULL' macro redefined > > > [-Wmacro-redefined] > > > #define NULL 0L > > > ^ > > > > what is the previous definition? > > http://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl/tree/include/stddef.h#n7 > so why was one header compiled as c++ the other not? > > > > and why is that conflicting? > > > > c11 6.10.3p2: > > > > #define A x > > #define A x > > > > is valid > > > > #define A x > > #define A y > > > > is not. > > > > > > > > [1] http://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl/tree/include/time.h#n11 > > > -- > > > /o__ > > > (_<^' It's better to burn out than it is to rust.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.