[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPLrYERCU9b+ZczOESMH8hLQ66FCU2J3XA9xMxF3Skr8cc9qeA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 20:54:15 +0200
From: Daniel Cegiełka <daniel.cegielka@...il.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow different paths for static and shared libraries
2015-06-01 3:27 GMT+02:00 Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>:
> On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 06:51:42PM -0300, Ismael Luceno wrote:
>> On Sun, 31 May 2015 12:30:34 -0400
>> Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> wrote:
>> A ld script in place of libc.so, containing "GROUP ( /lib/libc.so )",
>> would workaround that.
>
> Are you sure? I think that would result in a dependency for
> "/lib/libc.so" getting put in the binary rather than one for
> "libc.so", and that's also a serious bug.
from gentoo:
# cat /usr/lib/libc.so
/* GNU ld script
Use the shared library, but some functions are only in
the static library, so try that secondarily. */
OUTPUT_FORMAT(elf64-x86-64)
GROUP ( /lib64/libc.so.6 /usr/lib64/libc_nonshared.a AS_NEEDED (
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 ) )
btw. I am not a fan of this solution.
Daniel
> Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
