[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <AA1BBCEF-E785-48BD-AAE5-0CF19E580719@shiz.me>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 19:11:18 +0200
From: Shiz <hi@...z.me>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] add musl-clang, a wrapper for system clang installs
> On 29 May 2015, at 19:03, Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> wrote:
>
> This logic looks wrong. For example, "-L foo" would result in input=1,
> no? And same for any other options with arguments.
>
> Rich
Hmm, I’m afraid you’re right. I’ll need to rethink this approach...
I was slightly annoyed by it being needed in the first place, but there’s no
other way from what I could see than these markers to figure out what comes
from a user and what doesn’t, since clang re-orders -l and -L arguments.
If they weren’t needed I could just move -lc to the linker wrapper...
-S
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (802 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
