[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150529170349.GK17573@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 13:03:49 -0400
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] add musl-clang, a wrapper for system clang
installs
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 06:48:45PM +0200, Shiz wrote:
> +# prevent clang from running the linker (and erroring) on no input.
> +sflags=
> +eflags=
> +for x ; do
> + case "$x" in
> + -l*) input=1 ;;
> + -*) input= ;;
> + *) input=1 ;;
> + esac
> + if test "$input" ; then
> + sflags="-l-user-start"
> + eflags="-lc -l-user-end"
> + break
> + fi
> +done
This logic looks wrong. For example, "-L foo" would result in input=1,
no? And same for any other options with arguments.
Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
