|
Message-ID: <20150402213448.GD27899@port70.net> Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 23:34:48 +0200 From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: perl native musl, ldd * Jean-Marc Pigeon <jmp@...e.ca> [2015-04-02 16:40:22 -0400]: > Using ldd was the best way I found to list one package all > dependencies (looking at ELF file type ans searching for > required external components). > If you have a better way (more standard) to propose not using > ldd that will be a good thing. idea? if you care about the elf dependencies then use the elf standard an elf binary will have its dependencies in the dynamic section (DT_NEEDED entries, you can get them by readelf -d or objdump -p) (of course the names there are mapped to paths in an implementation defined way and will depend on the runtime environment)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.